[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses
From: |
Neil Jerram |
Subject: |
Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Dec 2007 19:24:28 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> Andreas Rottmann <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> You should probably also have a look at the Scheme-Level FFI of PLT
>> Scheme[1], and my reimplementation for Scheme 48[2].
>
> Thanks for the links, that's the kind of think I had in mind. Perhaps
> you'd like to port S42 to Guile as well? :-)
>From a _very_ quick look, my impression is that the PLT FFI is about
equivalent in complexity and function to what the code generation side
of G-Wrap provides.
If that's correct, then the key practical difference is that G-Wrap
does everything at build/compile time, where PLT FFI does everything
at runtime -- in which case, surely G-Wrap is the better option?
Regards,
Neil
- Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses, Andy Wingo, 2007/12/05
- Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses, Ludovic Courtès, 2007/12/09
- Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses, Andreas Rottmann, 2007/12/09
- Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses, Ludovic Courtès, 2007/12/11
- Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses, Klaus Schilling, 2007/12/12
- Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses,
Neil Jerram <=
- Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses, Clinton Ebadi, 2007/12/12
- Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses, Klaus Schilling, 2007/12/13
- Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses, Ludovic Courtès, 2007/12/13
- Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses, Ludovic Courtès, 2007/12/13