[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:20:19 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
Clinton Ebadi <address@hidden> writes:
> Perhaps G-Wrap could be modified to work at runtime? A few utilities
> from it would be of general use--e.g. the sublanguage for specifying
> the layout of C structs could be used for generating high level
> interfaces to network protocols without painful manual munging or
> resorting to C.
Actually, G-Wrap already does a number of things at run-time: it
maintains a run-time representation of wrapped types and functions and
constructs functions calls with `libffi' when that is possible.
However, it does so *in addition* to what it does at compile-time. So
you get the worst of both worlds: compile-time complexity, and added
run-time dependency and overhead. ;-)
Thanks,
Ludovic.
- Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses, Andy Wingo, 2007/12/05
- Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses, Ludovic Courtès, 2007/12/09
- Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses, Andreas Rottmann, 2007/12/09
- Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses, Ludovic Courtès, 2007/12/11
- Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses, Klaus Schilling, 2007/12/12
- Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses, Neil Jerram, 2007/12/12
- Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses, Clinton Ebadi, 2007/12/12
- Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses, Klaus Schilling, 2007/12/13
- Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses, Ludovic Courtès, 2007/12/13