[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Making the case for GNU Guix ... advice sought
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Making the case for GNU Guix ... advice sought |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Feb 2016 21:30:44 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> skribis:
> I’d also like to point you at https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01161771/en, in
> case you haven’t read it yet. It includes a very general comparison
> with tools like environment modules, spack, and easyBuild with a focus
> on reproducibility.
One of the things that has changed since this paper is the new --input
flag which allows you, from the command-line, to rewrite the dependency
tree of a package by replacing one package with another one (something
that’s relatively easy to do programmatically, but Spack showed that
it’s occasionally convenient to have it at the command line.)
Ludo’.
- Making the case for GNU Guix ... advice sought, Cook, Malcolm, 2016/02/08
- Re: Making the case for GNU Guix ... advice sought, Ricardo Wurmus, 2016/02/09
- Re: Making the case for GNU Guix ... advice sought, Leo Famulari, 2016/02/09
- Re: Making the case for GNU Guix ... advice sought,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- RE: Making the case for GNU Guix ... advice sought, Cook, Malcolm, 2016/02/18
- Re: Making the case for GNU Guix ... advice sought, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/02/28
- Re: Making the case for GNU Guix ... advice sought, Ricardo Wurmus, 2016/02/28
- RE: Making the case for GNU Guix ... advice sought, Cook, Malcolm, 2016/02/29
- RE: Making the case for GNU Guix ... advice sought, Cook, Malcolm, 2016/02/29
Re: Making the case for GNU Guix ... advice sought, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/02/09