[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Staying on top of Qt security
|
From: |
Andreas Enge |
|
Subject: |
Re: Staying on top of Qt security |
|
Date: |
Thu, 25 Feb 2016 10:04:30 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 09:35:45AM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote:
> I find it unlikely that an application would need both of gtk+ and qt.
Maybe I am wrong; jalv does depend on both... It creates binaries jalv.gtk
and jalv.qt. If nobody uses the qt version, we could remove the input qt-4.
Andreas
- Re: Staying on top of Qt security, (continued)
- Re: Staying on top of Qt security, Andreas Enge, 2016/02/18
- Re: Staying on top of Qt security, Christopher Allan Webber, 2016/02/20
- Re: Staying on top of Qt security, Leo Famulari, 2016/02/21
- Re: Staying on top of Qt security, Christopher Allan Webber, 2016/02/21
- Re: Staying on top of Qt security, Leo Famulari, 2016/02/21
- Re: Staying on top of Qt security, Andreas Enge, 2016/02/22
- Re: Staying on top of Qt security, Leo Famulari, 2016/02/22
- Re: Staying on top of Qt security, Andreas Enge, 2016/02/22
Re: Staying on top of Qt security, Andreas Enge, 2016/02/22
Re: Staying on top of Qt security, Andreas Enge, 2016/02/25
- Re: Staying on top of Qt security,
Andreas Enge <=
Re: Staying on top of Qt security, Ricardo Wurmus, 2016/02/25