Re: libtool archives introduce unwanted inputs to build

[Ludovic Courtès]

Jookia <address@hidden> skribis:

> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 05:14:53PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> address@hidden (宋文武) skribis:
>> I don’t think so.  :-)
>> 
>> From what I understand the problem is that we end up with the two
>> variants of gdk-pixbuf in the dependency graph, and it turns out that
>> it’s not the one we were hoping for that gets picked up.
>> 
>> The solution to this is to “debug” the dependency graph and arrange
>> things so that the dependency graph of GTK+ includes only one variant of
>> gdk-pixbuf.  (It might be that it’s easier said than done, but we have
>> to try!)

[...]

> That said, I don't know where we'd start looking at the dependency graph for 
> all
> packages on Guix that indirectly require GTK and make sure they don't use
> gdk-pixbuf directly.

I would suggest looking at the dependency graph of Thunar since that’s
the one 宋文武 mentioned.  For instance:

  guix graph -t references thunar | grep -e '-> .*gdk-pixbuf'

Ludo’.