[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Odd behavior with --dry-run and --upgrade
From: |
Andreas Enge |
Subject: |
Re: Odd behavior with --dry-run and --upgrade |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Jul 2016 09:46:00 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) |
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 12:18:41AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > I'm totally agree with this; nowadays I always use --dry-run with
> > --no-grafts option.
> Same here…
> > As a user I expect that --dry-run means no building at all.
> But honestly, I think changing ‘--dry-run’ to do ‘--dry-run --no-grafts’
> would be fine, and probably better than the current situation.
Yes, this is what I would expect. We could also have a "--dry-run --grafts"
option if anybody complains about the missing feature.
Andreas
- Odd behavior with --dry-run and --upgrade, Roel Janssen, 2016/07/23
- Re: Odd behavior with --dry-run and --upgrade, Leo Famulari, 2016/07/23
- Re: Odd behavior with --dry-run and --upgrade, Alex Kost, 2016/07/24
- Re: Odd behavior with --dry-run and --upgrade, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/07/24
- Re: Odd behavior with --dry-run and --upgrade,
Andreas Enge <=
- Re: Odd behavior with --dry-run and --upgrade, Roel Janssen, 2016/07/25
- Re: Odd behavior with --dry-run and --upgrade, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/07/26
- Re: Odd behavior with --dry-run and --upgrade, Roel Janssen, 2016/07/26
- Re: Odd behavior with --dry-run and --upgrade, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/07/26
- Re: Odd behavior with --dry-run and --upgrade, Alex Kost, 2016/07/27
- Re: Odd behavior with --dry-run and --upgrade, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/07/27
- Re: Odd behavior with --dry-run and --upgrade, Alex Kost, 2016/07/28
- Re: Odd behavior with --dry-run and --upgrade, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/07/28
- Re: Odd behavior with --dry-run and --upgrade, Alex Kost, 2016/07/30
- Re: Odd behavior with --dry-run and --upgrade, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/07/30