What about use debian's org.tar?
At 2017-07-18 20:40:17, "ng0" <address@hidden> wrote:
>Ludovic Courtès transcribed 0.2K bytes:
>> Hello,
>>
>> tumashu <address@hidden> skribis:
>>
>> > the first thing is improve font-build-system to support split package easy
>>
>> Good point, though I think we also need to find out how we would split
>> it, which may not be that simple.
>>
>> Ludo’.
>>
>>
>noto-cjk is offered in different packages and blends:
>https://www.google.com/get/noto/help/cjk
>noto itself is offered on the website in many different
>blends aswell:
>https://www.google.com/get/noto/
>
>By the way, this is totally unversioned. Is our only way
>to know that noto has been updated by our package reporting
>a hash missmatch? Looks to me like it is.
>Should we store the fonts somewhere versioned as a fallback?
>--
>ng0
>GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
>GnuPG: https://n0is.noblogs.org/my-keys
>https://www.infotropique.org https://krosos.org