[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [rgui-dev] Re: GUItopia mixin names
From: |
Tom Sawyer |
Subject: |
Re: [rgui-dev] Re: GUItopia mixin names |
Date: |
23 Aug 2002 01:31:06 -0600 |
On Fri, 2002-08-23 at 01:15, Harry Ohlsen wrote:
> Is there any reason you couldn't have a module with two sub-modules? Then,
> you could call the two mixins something like AutoObservable::Variables and
> AutoObservable::Methods. The main module wouldn't necessarily contain
> anythong other than the Variables and Methods modules; it would just be
> providing a namespace. That would nice for a couple of reasons: you'd only
> have to 'require' one module, and if you come up with other related, but
> orthogonal mixins, you could just add more sub-modules.
that's a great idea! unless you come up with a better one then i'm going
to use this idea. thanks!
> I'm not sure whether the "Auto" adds anything to the meaning, by the way. The
> automatic-ness (to coin a word) could just be considered an attribute of how
> the mixin works, in practice.
i think we need to use 'Auto' because ruby already has a module called
Observer for the typical Obeserver pattern.
> I'm still thinking, but it's really hard to come up something that
> encompasses
> precisely what the mixins are doing. However, I feel like the "Observable"
> (or "Observer") is probably pretty close, anyway.
yes, let me know if you think of anything better. thanks for the help.
~transami