[Gzz-commits] gzz/Documentation/Manuscripts/Irregu irregu.tex

[Tuomas J. Lukka]

CVSROOT:        /cvsroot/gzz
Module name:    gzz
Changes by:     Tuomas J. Lukka <address@hidden>        02/11/12 08:37:28

Modified files:
        Documentation/Manuscripts/Irregu: irregu.tex 

Log message:
        minor points

CVSWeb URLs:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/gzz/gzz/Documentation/Manuscripts/Irregu/irregu.tex.diff?tr1=1.26&tr2=1.27&r1=text&r2=text

Patches:
Index: gzz/Documentation/Manuscripts/Irregu/irregu.tex
diff -u gzz/Documentation/Manuscripts/Irregu/irregu.tex:1.26 
gzz/Documentation/Manuscripts/Irregu/irregu.tex:1.27
--- gzz/Documentation/Manuscripts/Irregu/irregu.tex:1.26        Tue Nov 12 
08:32:09 2002
+++ gzz/Documentation/Manuscripts/Irregu/irregu.tex     Tue Nov 12 08:37:28 2002
@@ -222,15 +222,14 @@
 
 Fourier viewpoint
 
+If edge does not ripple, claustrophobia comes back!
 
-Considered from a purely physical viewpoint, the tearout is not really
+From a purely physical viewpoint the tearout is not really
 a good metaphor\cite{kuhn91formalization}:
 a real torn piece of paper cannot change the place from where it is torn, with 
the edges rippling etc.
 However, similar jagged edges have been used in technical drawings for quite 
some
-time to indicate that the depicted object extends beyond the part drawn in the 
diagram;
-this is the metaphor we wish to hang our construction on.
-
-Because of this, it should be readily comprehensible
+time to indicate that the depicted object extends beyond the part drawn in the 
diagram.
+Because of this, it should be comprehensible
 to users that we're not tearing the original paper but only a depiction of it.
 
 \subsection{Detailed design ``What?''}
@@ -422,6 +421,8 @@
       "main" focus view
 
 frequencies: only low/high in frames
+
+TODO: usability tests
 
 \section{Acknowledgments}