gzz-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Gzz-commits] gzz/Documentation/Manuscripts/Irregu irregu.tex


From: Tuomas J. Lukka
Subject: [Gzz-commits] gzz/Documentation/Manuscripts/Irregu irregu.tex
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 08:43:26 -0500

CVSROOT:        /cvsroot/gzz
Module name:    gzz
Changes by:     Tuomas J. Lukka <address@hidden>        02/11/12 08:43:26

Modified files:
        Documentation/Manuscripts/Irregu: irregu.tex 

Log message:
        More understanding

CVSWeb URLs:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/gzz/gzz/Documentation/Manuscripts/Irregu/irregu.tex.diff?tr1=1.28&tr2=1.29&r1=text&r2=text

Patches:
Index: gzz/Documentation/Manuscripts/Irregu/irregu.tex
diff -u gzz/Documentation/Manuscripts/Irregu/irregu.tex:1.28 
gzz/Documentation/Manuscripts/Irregu/irregu.tex:1.29
--- gzz/Documentation/Manuscripts/Irregu/irregu.tex:1.28        Tue Nov 12 
08:42:12 2002
+++ gzz/Documentation/Manuscripts/Irregu/irregu.tex     Tue Nov 12 08:43:26 2002
@@ -208,6 +208,9 @@
 One reason for this is that the frame is often visually too small for its 
contents
 to yield a balanced graphical design. For example, 
 
+Also, because the frame moves differently from its content, it is an extra 
``object''
+that the user's visual system must track.
+
 Additionally, if looking at ``printed matter'' through the viewport,
 the frame outside the canvas and graphical frames inside the canvas can make 
the display
 much less clear.
@@ -215,15 +218,17 @@
 The torn edge separates itself visually from the content, alleviating
 the visual tension...
 
+Need to maintain illusion: ``we see a piece of the canvas'', not ``we see the 
canvas through
+a hole''.
+If edge does not ripple, claustrophobia comes back! Again, shaped thing PLACED 
on top of canvas,
+not part of canvas!
+
 The irregularity of the edge allows a some of the context of the viewport to 
be partially
 seen.
 
 Focus+context
 
 Fourier viewpoint
-
-If edge does not ripple, claustrophobia comes back! Again, shaped thing PLACED 
on top of canvas,
-not part of canvas!
 
 From a purely physical viewpoint the tearout is not really
 a good metaphor\cite{kuhn91formalization}:




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]