Re: [Gzz] cellview_naming

[Tuomas Lukka]

On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 04:51:15PM +0100, Benja Fallenstein wrote:
> Tuomas Lukka wrote:
> 
> >>>I think that maybe taking the approach you outline above would be better
> >>>(passing parameters in constructor).
> >>>     
> >>>
> >>Hm. Yes, could be.
> >>   
> >>
> >
> >Needs its own PEG, though; but for this PEG, it's mean abolishing the 
> >CellContentView
> >and CellBoxView classes.
> 
> So you're suggesting to make getting rid of CellContentView and 
> CellBoxView part of the PEG, but not the replacement? That sounds a bit 
> strange to me ;-)

I'm suggesting that we do that for now, using CellInBox for both directly,
and PEGging the change to ViewContext (i.e. removing getView, getCellView, 
getCellContentView, and getWindow)

        Tuomas