Re: [Gzz] cellview_naming

[Benja Fallenstein]

Tuomas Lukka wrote:

> > > I think that maybe taking the approach you outline above would be better
> > > (passing parameters in constructor).
> > >      
> > Hm. Yes, could be.
> >    
>
> Needs its own PEG, though; but for this PEG, it's mean abolishing the 
> CellContentView
> and CellBoxView classes.

So you're suggesting to make getting rid of CellContentView and 
CellBoxView part of the PEG, but not the replacement? That sounds a bit 
strange to me ;-)

- Benja