Re: [Gzz] cellview_naming

[Benja Fallenstein]

Tuomas Lukka wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 04:51:15PM +0100, Benja Fallenstein wrote:
>  
>
> > Tuomas Lukka wrote:
> >
> >    
> >
> > > > > I think that maybe taking the approach you outline above would be better
> > > > > (passing parameters in constructor).
> > > > >    
> > > > >
> > > > >          
> > > > Hm. Yes, could be.
> > > >  
> > > >
> > > >        
> > > Needs its own PEG, though; but for this PEG, it's mean abolishing the 
> > > CellContentView
> > > and CellBoxView classes.
> > >      
> > So you're suggesting to make getting rid of CellContentView and 
> > CellBoxView part of the PEG, but not the replacement? That sounds a bit 
> > strange to me ;-)
> >    
>
> I'm suggesting that we do that for now, using CellInBox for both directly,
> and PEGging the change to ViewContext (i.e. removing getView, getCellView, 
> getCellContentView, and getWindow)

Hmmm. Ok...