Re: [Gzz] 22nd (hh)

[hemppah]

Quoting Tuomas Lukka <address@hidden>:

> On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 10:13:45AM +0200, address@hidden wrote:
> > Quoting Tuomas Lukka <address@hidden>:
> > 
> > 
> > > > One thing also which came in my mind another day was that perhaps I
> > > should
> > > > critical perspective when evaluating existing p2p systems. By doing
> that,
> > > > there should not be so much pages in M.T. (not a review). Comments ?
> > > 
> > > Sorry, I don't understand what you're saying.
> > > 
> > 
> > Ah, words missing again. Sorry for that.
> > 
> > I simply meant that perhaps I should take a more critical perspective on
> > existing p2p systems instead of doing a review-like summary of existing
> systems
> > (e.g. what is good, what is bad and why etc.) ?
> 
> What's the difference?
> 

Perhaps there could less pages in M.T. ;). 

To be serious, as I said last friday I found quite similar paper from the net as
my  M.T is. The paper which I found *is* review-like summary of existing p2p
systems. I just thought that it would be benefitical thing to look things from
*another* perspective.

But on the another hand, the difference between (deep) review and critical
analysis might be quite insignificant.

-Hermanni





-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/