gzz-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

urn-5 vs hashes (was: Re: [Gzz] RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Fenfire, RDF (re "Tow


From: Benja Fallenstein
Subject: urn-5 vs hashes (was: Re: [Gzz] RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Fenfire, RDF (re "Towards a Standard Graph-Based..."))
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 20:20:05 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021226 Debian/1.2.1-9


Hi Toni--

Alatalo Toni wrote:
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, Danny Ayers wrote:
Hmm, I'm sure you have good reason to use something other than URIs for

(replied to Danny by private mail)

afaik the cryptographic content hash forms the URI (urn-5)

Nope, urn:urn-5 is for random numbers (when you create a new node and want to assign a random URI to it) and is not related to hashes. There's no URI scheme or URN namespace for hashed data, yet (AFAIK).

(Sorry to send this thru the lists, but it would be bad if this misconception stood without refutation...)

- Benja





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]