gzz-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Gzz] Re: [Gzz-commits] storm/doc/pegboard/attacking_gisp--hemppah peg.r


From: Tuomas Lukka
Subject: [Gzz] Re: [Gzz-commits] storm/doc/pegboard/attacking_gisp--hemppah peg.rst
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 13:02:54 +0300
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i

On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 02:57:13AM -0400, Hermanni Hyytiälä wrote:
> CVSROOT:      /cvsroot/storm
> Module name:  storm
> Branch:       
> Changes by:   Hermanni Hyytiälä <address@hidden>      03/06/17 02:57:13
> 
> Modified files:
>       doc/pegboard/attacking_gisp--hemppah: peg.rst 
> 
> Log message:
>       fix
> 
> CVSWeb URLs:
> http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/storm/storm/doc/pegboard/attacking_gisp--hemppah/peg.rst.diff?tr1=1.37&tr2=1.38&r1=text&r2=text
> 
> Patches:
> Index: storm/doc/pegboard/attacking_gisp--hemppah/peg.rst
> diff -u storm/doc/pegboard/attacking_gisp--hemppah/peg.rst:1.37 
> storm/doc/pegboard/attacking_gisp--hemppah/peg.rst:1.38
> --- storm/doc/pegboard/attacking_gisp--hemppah/peg.rst:1.37   Mon Jun 16 
> 07:47:36 2003
> +++ storm/doc/pegboard/attacking_gisp--hemppah/peg.rst        Tue Jun 17 
> 02:57:13 2003
> @@ -4,8 +4,8 @@
>  
>  :Authors:  Hermanni Hyytiälä
>  :Date-Created: 2003-06-05
> -:Last-Modified: $Date: 2003/06/16 11:47:36 $
> -:Revision: $Revision: 1.37 $
> +:Last-Modified: $Date: 2003/06/17 06:57:13 $
> +:Revision: $Revision: 1.38 $
>  :Status:   Incomplete
>  
>  .. :Stakeholders:
> @@ -279,11 +279,11 @@
>    fail.  
>  
>    n peers, O(log n) path length, all peers perform n lookups. Then the total
> -  number of packets is (n-1)((n-1)(log n))
> +  number of packets is n((n-1)(log n))
>    
>    n peers where fraction f are hostile, O(log n) path length, all peers 
>    perform n lookups. Then the total number of lost packets is 
> -  [f^((log n)-1)]*[(n-1)((n-1)(log n))]
> +  [f^((log n)-1)]*[n((n-1)(log n))]
>    
Where are the sources / derivations for the formulas?

If you're using O(log n) for the path length, then you definitely
should not let "n-1" enter the formulas anywhere...

        Tuomas




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]