[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fwd: grammar for propositional logic
From: |
John P. Hartmann |
Subject: |
Fwd: grammar for propositional logic |
Date: |
Wed, 1 Sep 2010 07:50:49 +0200 |
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: John P. Hartmann <address@hidden>
Date: 1 September 2010 07:49
Subject: Re: grammar for propositional logic
To: Martin McDermott <address@hidden>
You should inspect the .output file to resolve your conflicts. For
something as simple as yours, you should have zero tolerance for
conflicts, even shift/reduce.
As a minimum you need to deal with operator associativity and precedence.
%left T_OR T_XOR
%left T_AND
Might be what you want, if AND binds closer than OR.
j.
- grammar for propositional logic, Martin McDermott, 2010/09/01
- Re: grammar for propositional logic, Alfonso Urdaneta, 2010/09/01
- Re: grammar for propositional logic, Martin McDermott, 2010/09/01
- Message not available
- Fwd: grammar for propositional logic,
John P. Hartmann <=
- Re: grammar for propositional logic, Martin McDermott, 2010/09/01
- Re: grammar for propositional logic, John P. Hartmann, 2010/09/01
- Message not available
- Re: grammar for propositional logic, John P. Hartmann, 2010/09/01
- Re: grammar for propositional logic, Martin McDermott, 2010/09/01
- Re: grammar for propositional logic, John P. Hartmann, 2010/09/01
- Re: grammar for propositional logic, Martin McDermott, 2010/09/01
- Re: grammar for propositional logic, John P. Hartmann, 2010/09/01
- Re: grammar for propositional logic, Martin McDermott, 2010/09/01
- Re: grammar for propositional logic, John P. Hartmann, 2010/09/01
Re: grammar for propositional logic, Hans Aberg, 2010/09/01