[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: grammar for propositional logic
From: |
John P. Hartmann |
Subject: |
Re: grammar for propositional logic |
Date: |
Wed, 1 Sep 2010 08:35:34 +0200 |
If you mean why do you get the shift/reduce errors, it is because your
grammar is ambiguous.
You can deal with the ambiguity in several ways, but %left to specify
associativity and precedence as I said earlier seems like the easiest
in your case.
Doing that will remove all conflicts from your grammar, even the one
in state 14.
j.
- grammar for propositional logic, Martin McDermott, 2010/09/01
- Re: grammar for propositional logic, Alfonso Urdaneta, 2010/09/01
- Re: grammar for propositional logic, Martin McDermott, 2010/09/01
- Message not available
- Fwd: grammar for propositional logic, John P. Hartmann, 2010/09/01
- Re: grammar for propositional logic, Martin McDermott, 2010/09/01
- Re: grammar for propositional logic,
John P. Hartmann <=
- Message not available
- Re: grammar for propositional logic, John P. Hartmann, 2010/09/01
- Re: grammar for propositional logic, Martin McDermott, 2010/09/01
- Re: grammar for propositional logic, John P. Hartmann, 2010/09/01
- Re: grammar for propositional logic, Martin McDermott, 2010/09/01
- Re: grammar for propositional logic, John P. Hartmann, 2010/09/01
- Re: grammar for propositional logic, Martin McDermott, 2010/09/01
- Re: grammar for propositional logic, John P. Hartmann, 2010/09/01
Re: grammar for propositional logic, Hans Aberg, 2010/09/01