Re: server iteration

[Alexander Jolk]

Tod Oace wrote:
> On May 20, 2005, at 02:10, Alexander Jolk wrote:
>
> > > Does anyone use the server= iteration? I'm not seeing how it would  
> > > be  used the way it currently works. Changing it to stop at the  
> > > first  successful server seems much more useful to me.
> >
> >
> > I'm not using it, but have you thought of combining this with  
> > SingleCopy?  That might just do what you need.
>
>
> An interesting idea, but I would still have to double my quantity of  
> copy statements, yes? One set for the primary server and a second for  
> the alternate. Or am I misunderstanding?

As I said, I'm not using it right now, but I think it should work with 
just one statement.  You set SingleCopy = ( on ) and then give your 
primary and failover server as a list, server = ( primary:failover ).  I 
would expect the copy to just stick with the first server found in that 
case.

Alex




--
Alexander Jolk         /         BUF Compagnie
tel +33-1 42 68 18 28 /  fax +33-1 42 68 18 29