[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c
From: |
John Millaway |
Subject: |
Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Sep 2002 06:11:05 -0700 (PDT) |
> Unless all the variables in
> a struct are unsigned chars, calloc() or memset() do *not* guarantee
> proper initialization to zero.
Interesting. Can you give an example where this would fail? (Currently, we do
both: memset after allocation, then assign to zero/NULL during
initialization.)
> did you consider using a tool like 'cscope' to that end?
Yes, it's built into my editor (ViM). `nm' does the trick, too.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes
http://finance.yahoo.com
- bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, Bruce Lilly, 2002/09/14
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, John Millaway, 2002/09/15
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, Bruce Lilly, 2002/09/15
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, Bruce Lilly, 2002/09/15
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, John Millaway, 2002/09/15
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, Hans-Bernhard Broeker, 2002/09/16
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c,
John Millaway <=
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, Hans-Bernhard Broeker, 2002/09/16
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, John Millaway, 2002/09/16
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, Bruce Lilly, 2002/09/16
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, Hans-Bernhard Broeker, 2002/09/17
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, Akim Demaille, 2002/09/17
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, Hans-Bernhard Broeker, 2002/09/17
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, Akim Demaille, 2002/09/17
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, Hans-Bernhard Broeker, 2002/09/17
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, Bruce Lilly, 2002/09/17
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, Bruce Lilly, 2002/09/17