[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c
From: |
Hans-Bernhard Broeker |
Subject: |
Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Sep 2002 14:31:27 +0200 (MET DST) |
On 17 Sep 2002, Akim Demaille wrote:
> Hans-Bernhard> Think of platforms where pointers don't natively exist,
>
> Question: will you run scanners on them? (This is a true question)
I myself probably won't. But that's just me, and I certainly can't speak
for the vast silent masses of users out there who might be doing such
things.
I'm aware this is on the borderline of maintaining utmost code
portability---but if it can be done without major hassle, I think it still
should be done.
--
Hans-Bernhard Broeker (address@hidden)
Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, (continued)
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, John Millaway, 2002/09/15
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, Hans-Bernhard Broeker, 2002/09/16
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, John Millaway, 2002/09/16
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, Hans-Bernhard Broeker, 2002/09/16
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, John Millaway, 2002/09/16
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, Bruce Lilly, 2002/09/16
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, Hans-Bernhard Broeker, 2002/09/17
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, Akim Demaille, 2002/09/17
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, Hans-Bernhard Broeker, 2002/09/17
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, Akim Demaille, 2002/09/17
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c,
Hans-Bernhard Broeker <=
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, Bruce Lilly, 2002/09/17
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, Bruce Lilly, 2002/09/17
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, Hans-Bernhard Broeker, 2002/09/17
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, Bruce Lilly, 2002/09/17
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, Hans-Bernhard Broeker, 2002/09/17
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, Bruce Lilly, 2002/09/17
- Re: bug(s) in 2.5.19 skel.c, Hans-Bernhard Broeker, 2002/09/18