[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: flex 2.5.21 released
From: |
W. L. Estes |
Subject: |
Re: flex 2.5.21 released |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Sep 2002 13:34:49 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Tuesday, 17 September 2002,12:31 -0400, Bruce Lilly wrote:
> Patches to Makefile.am would be ineffective (even if it were
> clear what would need to be patched) because neither
> configure nor the config.status that it generates does
> anything with Makefile.am.
Bruce, you're not understanding how flex is built:
1: automake processes Makefile.am to create Makefile.in.
2: configure processes Makefile.in to create Makefile
Your problem is most likely an automake problem though.
--Will
- flex 2.5.21 released, W. L. Estes, 2002/09/17
- Re: flex 2.5.21 released, Bruce Lilly, 2002/09/17
- Re: flex 2.5.21 released, Bruce Lilly, 2002/09/17
- Re: flex 2.5.21 released, W. L. Estes, 2002/09/17
- Re: flex 2.5.21 released, Bruce Lilly, 2002/09/17
- Re: flex 2.5.21 released, Bastian Kleineidam, 2002/09/17
- Re: flex 2.5.21 released,
W. L. Estes <=
- Re: flex 2.5.21 released, Bruce Lilly, 2002/09/17
- Re: flex 2.5.21 released, W. L. Estes, 2002/09/17
- Re: flex 2.5.21 released, Bruce Lilly, 2002/09/17
- Re: flex 2.5.21 released, Akim Demaille, 2002/09/18
- Re: flex 2.5.21 released, Bastian Kleineidam, 2002/09/18
- Re: flex 2.5.21 released, W. L. Estes, 2002/09/18
- Re: flex 2.5.21 released, Hans-Bernhard Broeker, 2002/09/18
Re: flex 2.5.21 released, John Millaway, 2002/09/17