help-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Sociological Data Analysis with Emacs?


From: Lennart Borgman (gmail)
Subject: Re: Sociological Data Analysis with Emacs?
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 00:02:32 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061207 Thunderbird/1.5.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666

sven.bretfeld@gmx.ch wrote:
Dear Everybody

I have quite a special question, inspired by the very interesting
recent thread which was inaccurately called "An extremely dumb
curiosity question".

An editor as powerful as Emacs should have the ability to function as
a QDA (Qualitative Data Analysis) tool. Maybe some of you have worked
with software like Atlas.ti which is only available for Windows (and
very expensive) or GTAMSAnalyzer which runs on GNU/Linux via
GNUStep. You know what I'm talking about.

As a fanatic Emacs-newbie I would find it wonderful to get rid of
Atlas.ti (my last indispensable Windows program) and to have similar
functionality within Emacs. Maybe there is already a lisp-package that
can be used for qualitative data analysis.

The main function of a QDA tool is to markup and query a set of texts,
say, interviews with people who, for example, recently converted from
Christianity to a different religious community. These interviews may
contain a variety of similar statements that can be "coded" by the
researcher who marks the relevant passages and gives them keywords
like: experience, spirit, power, charisma and so on. A query in this
database should for example count all the passages where, for example,
"experience" occurs together with "charisma" and display a list of
hits that functions as links to the original passages.

Does anybody know about such a package?

Best wishes,
Sven


I do not know much about QDA tools, I have never got the time to test them. I remember however there was a discussion about such tools on RadPsyNet. Unfortunately I believe Atlas.ti was one of the tools mentioned and no one proposed any better or free tools, but some other tools were mentioned. You can find RadPsyNet here:

 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RadPsyNet-Members/

The thread I think about has the subject

 Computer Tools for Analysing Qualitative Data




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]