[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22
From: |
Ilya Zakharevich |
Subject: |
Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22 |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:33:25 -0000 |
User-agent: |
slrn/0.9.8.1pl1 (Linux) |
On 2010-10-21, Jason Rumney <jasonrumney@gmail.com> wrote:
> Was the file edited on Windows? Does it contain euro signs,
> "smartquotes" or other non-standard Microsoft additions to Latin-1?
Is not it siege mentality? cp1252 is as standard as iso-SHIT-1 (in
fact much more standard ;-). This fact should better be recognized by
Emacs' recognition engine...
Hope this helps,
Ilya
P.S. And BOTH of them are latin-1. So if you CARE, please use proper names.
- word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Jason Rumney, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Jason Rumney, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22,
Ilya Zakharevich <=
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09