help-gnunet
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Help-gnunet] Re: gnunetd suddenly very unstable


From: Christian Grothoff
Subject: Re: [Help-gnunet] Re: gnunetd suddenly very unstable
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 16:00:14 -0500
User-agent: KMail/1.4.1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Friday 27 September 2002 05:59 pm, David Hansen wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 28 at  0:30 Christian Drechsler wrote:
> > hi!
> >
> > does anyone know if any of the filesystems linux can use doesn't have
> > this limitation? i could easily reformat the partition if that was the
> > case.
>
> ext2 has a limit of 2GB but AFAIK reiserfs allows larger files.

That may be, but the question is, if it is only a FS limitation or if the gdbm 
code itself has a limitation. GNUnet is internally limited to 4 GB files 
(don't quote me on that, I've never tried), and while this limitation would 
not apply to gdbm (since we never access that file directly), I can very well 
imagine gdbm using 'signed int' to access the file. 

The real question here is, if you really need to have > 2 GB in the gdbm 
database (that's a huge amount of content that has been migrated; did you 
actually configure GNUnet to allow using that much space -- or did we go over 
the limit that was set by the user!?)

Christian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE9lhhe9tNtMeXQLkIRAhKuAJ4qhaCRJOA+qtLNuSVL0Baw/rS8tQCeOpJ+
VNzOyWbf41Pv+WDJV5KmF3k=
=2e1/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]