[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: octave-forge vs. lam-mpi
From: |
Joe Koski |
Subject: |
Re: octave-forge vs. lam-mpi |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Nov 2005 10:27:06 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.1.051004 |
Marius,
Although I haven't tried it with 2.1.72 on my Mac, my experience is that you
can use the same octave-forge, but you have to rebuild octave-forge after
you install the new octave. This is because octave-forge is built with
mkoctfile from 2.1.72 and installed in directories labeled with 2.1.72. If
you don't do the rebuild, octave can't find octave-forge, and you get
messages about incompatible versions when you try to use the old .oct files.
Joe
on 11/15/05 10:05 AM, Marius Schamschula at address@hidden wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm in the process of updating octave to version 2.1.72 for Mac OS X.
> Since I build two versions of octave (with and without lam-mpi), I was
> wondering if I could use the same build of octave-forge for both.
>
> TIA,
>
> Marius
> --
> Marius Schamschula Webmaster
>
> The Huntsville Macintosh Users Group
> www.hmug.org
>
> webmaster at hmug dot org marius at schamschula dot com
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
>
> Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
> How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
> Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------