[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: octave-forge vs. lam-mpi
From: |
Marius Schamschula |
Subject: |
Re: octave-forge vs. lam-mpi |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Nov 2005 11:32:50 -0600 |
Thanks Joe,
This was my hunch, since both packages seemed to be near identical.
BTW, I always rebuild octave-forge, since things go into a different
tree. I just wanted to do it once (per OS version).
On Nov 15, 2005, at 11:27 AM, Joe Koski wrote:
Marius,
Although I haven't tried it with 2.1.72 on my Mac, my experience is
that you
can use the same octave-forge, but you have to rebuild octave-forge
after
you install the new octave. This is because octave-forge is built with
mkoctfile from 2.1.72 and installed in directories labeled with
2.1.72. If
you don't do the rebuild, octave can't find octave-forge, and you get
messages about incompatible versions when you try to use the old .oct
files.
Joe
Marius
--
Marius Schamschula Webmaster
The Huntsville Macintosh Users Group
www.hmug.org
webmaster at hmug dot org marius at schamschula dot com
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------