[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: octave-forge vs. lam-mpi
From: |
Javier Fernández Baldomero |
Subject: |
Re: octave-forge vs. lam-mpi |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Nov 2005 08:34:53 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) |
Marius Schamschula wrote:
I'm in the process of updating octave to version 2.1.72 for Mac OS X.
Since I build two versions of octave (with and without lam-mpi), I was
wondering if I could use the same build of octave-forge for both.
Hi,
with lam-mpi... you mean using the ./configure switch?
_________________________
Optional Packages:
--with-PACKAGE[=ARG] use PACKAGE [ARG=yes]
--without-PACKAGE do not use PACKAGE (same as --with-PACKAGE=no)
...
--without-mpi don't use MPI
_________________________
If so, I think JWE recently clarified that the switch is no longer
required and may dissapear soon.
Let me see if I can find the posting.... yup! here it is
http://www.octave.org/octave-lists/archive/help-octave.2005/msg03626.html
in thread
http://www.octave.org/octave-lists/archive/help-octave.2005/threads.html#03620
I suspected that, but I was clueless as I cannot read configure scripts :-(
http://www.octave.org/octave-lists/archive/help-octave.2004/msg02318.html
in thread
http://www.octave.org/octave-lists/archive/help-octave.2004/threads.html#02318
-javier
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------