[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: io_close proposal
From: |
Marcus Brinkmann |
Subject: |
Re: io_close proposal |
Date: |
Sun, 19 May 2002 23:33:14 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Sun, May 19, 2002 at 01:31:54PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Marcus Brinkmann <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Well, the real problem, and the explanation why my idea won't work is this:
> >
> > If the server sees 1 extant send right, he doesn't know if this is the
> > callers extant send right, or if the number of extant send rights has been
> > 2 and the caller did:
> >
> > io_close_request(port)
> > mach_port_deallocate(mach_task_self(), port);
>
> Here, the user has not followed the protocol. He has the port
> *twice*, and if he wants close actions to work properly, he must call
> io_close_request on *each*.
Sorry, I was not being clear. I was arguing here against the idea of
sending the io_close _without sending the port right along with the
message_, which is a different idea from the one I originally proposed.
The point is that the current interruptible RPC stubs expect that the caller
keeps a send right for each send right moved in the message. I was trying
to think about a way to make io_close work without moving the send right of
the caller to the server.
I think I have showed that such an approach is impossible to work reliably.
I should have given the io_close_request above a different name to
distinguish it from the original proposal.
Thanks,
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org address@hidden
Marcus Brinkmann GNU http://www.gnu.org address@hidden
address@hidden
http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de
Re: io_close proposal, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/15
Re: io_close proposal, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/15
Re: io_close proposal, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/05/16
- Re: io_close proposal, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/16
- Re: io_close proposal, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/05/16
- Re: io_close proposal, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/19
- Re: io_close proposal,
Marcus Brinkmann <=
- Re: io_close proposal, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/19
Re: io_close proposal, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/16
- Re: io_close proposal, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/05/16
- Re: io_close proposal, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/05/16
- Re: io_close proposal, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/16
- Re: io_close proposal, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/16
- Re: io_close proposal, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/16
- Re: io_close proposal, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/05/16
Re: io_close proposal, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/16
Re: io_close proposal, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/16