[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: io_close proposal
From: |
Thomas Bushnell, BSG |
Subject: |
Re: io_close proposal |
Date: |
19 May 2002 18:45:56 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Marcus Brinkmann <address@hidden> writes:
> Sorry, I was not being clear. I was arguing here against the idea of
> sending the io_close _without sending the port right along with the
> message_, which is a different idea from the one I originally proposed.
Ah, quite right, yes. The send right must get actually sent (by
MOVE_SEND) along with the message. Of course, there's no way for the
server to know how it was sent, but that's not important.
Re: io_close proposal, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/15
Re: io_close proposal, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/15
Re: io_close proposal, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/05/16
- Re: io_close proposal, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/16
- Re: io_close proposal, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/05/16
- Re: io_close proposal, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/19
- Re: io_close proposal, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/05/19
- Re: io_close proposal,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG <=
Re: io_close proposal, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/16
- Re: io_close proposal, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/05/16
- Re: io_close proposal, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/05/16
- Re: io_close proposal, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/16
- Re: io_close proposal, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/16
- Re: io_close proposal, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/16
- Re: io_close proposal, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/05/16
Re: io_close proposal, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/16
Re: io_close proposal, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/16
Re: io_close proposal, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/16