it should be planar, AFAIK. If it is not planar, that means that the
original non-circular one is not planar
No, it isn't necesarily planar. A while ago I found a graph for which
the RT layout was planar but the circular RT layout wasn't, and I also
thought it was a bug, but it isn't. Try this graph for instance (given
as an edge list):
0-1, 0-2, 0-3, 0-4, 0-5, 0-6, 0-7, 0-8, 0-9, 4-10, 9-10
When you use vertex 0 as root, the RT layout is planar but the circular
RT layout isn't.
--
T.
, the circular one is just the
transformation of that. Can you send us (in private if it's big, to
Tamas and me) an example? I think this is a bug.
Best,
Gabor
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Robert Belleman <address@hidden
<mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
Hi,
I am applying the circular Reingold Tilford layout algorithm on a tree
consisting of 23k nodes and the same number of edges. I was expecting
this
algorithm to produce a planar layout but it doesn't.
Can anybody enlighten me?
Thanks,
-- Rob
--
Robert Belleman, PhD, Computational Science, Faculty of Science
Universiteit van Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam
The Netherlands. T: +31 20 525 7272/7463 F: +31 20 525 7490
W: http://www.science.uva.nl/~robbel/ E: address@hidden
<mailto:address@hidden>
_______________________________________________
igraph-help mailing list
address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/igraph-help
--
Gabor Csardi <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> MTA
KFKI RMKI
_______________________________________________
igraph-help mailing list
address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/igraph-help
_______________________________________________
igraph-help mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/igraph-help