Re: [igraph] About the cannoical place for igraph

[Gábor Csárdi]

I believe that we have the correct address in our files, I remember
fixing it long ago. It might happen that in the files that we took
from other projects, the address is wrong. Can you send me the output
you get in private? Thanks.

Gabor

On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 10:15:33AM -0500, Gábor Csárdi wrote:
>> Hi Pierre,
>>
>> my understanding was that you want the C library and the Python
>> extension, not the R package. So you want the R package (as well)?
>>
>> 0.6.5 is the latest version for the C lib and the Python extension
>> 0.6.6 is the latest version for the R package, compared to 0.6.6 it
>> contains some bug fixes only, see
>> http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/igraph/NEWS
>> It was never announced officially on the igraph homepage, because it
>> is not a big deal.
>>
>> I am not sure which file you are trying to compile. For the R package you 
>> need
>>
>> R CMD INSTALL <tarball>
>>
>> but of course it is better to install it as install.packages("igraph") form 
>> R.
>>
>> The C lib has the usual autoconf procedure:
>> ./configure
>> make
>> make install
>
> Hi Gábor,
>
> You're right, I had actually retrieved the wrong sources. I can now compile 
> the
> latest version correctly.
>
> While checking the quality of the RPM produced I ended up with a lot of 
> warnings
> mentioning that the FSF address used in the license headers is incorrect, it 
> is
> still referring to the old address of the FSF.
> It's a boring patch to do but I would nice to have it done. Would you like me 
> to
> propose it?
>
>
> Thanks for your help,
>
> Pierre
>
> _______________________________________________
> igraph-help mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/igraph-help