[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Microsoft Exchange Server
From: |
Adam Sjøgren |
Subject: |
Re: Microsoft Exchange Server |
Date: |
Sun, 05 Feb 2006 03:08:11 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) XEmacs/21.4.18 (linux) |
On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 17:28:50 -0600, Andrew wrote:
> I use nnimap with our Exchange system, and it's tolerable.
> It's certainly better than using Outlook. And while
> MS-IMAP isn't ideal, it seems to be sufficient for normal
> splitting, reading, and expiry. I throw in the agent and
> read offline for speed.
> I wouldn't interpret Sébastien's comments as ``Using
> Exchange with IMAP will cause you more trouble than it's
> worth.'' If you can get the admin to turn it on, I say go
> for it.
Okay, I'm not sure yet how much HTML-email I will be getting (that was
the part of Sébastiens email that discouraged me) - so I'll give it a
shot. Perhaps they wont mind.
(Or I'll have to try making an IMAP<->OWA thing, although I would
guess that would be too much work...)
Thanks for the comments,
Adam
--
"You know, if the sun was an oboe, what would you do?" Adam Sjøgren
asjo@koldfront.dk
- Microsoft Exchange Server, Adam Sjøgren, 2006/02/03
- Re: Microsoft Exchange Server, Paul D. Smith, 2006/02/03
- Re: Microsoft Exchange Server, Sébastien Kirche, 2006/02/04
- Re: Microsoft Exchange Server, Adam Sjøgren, 2006/02/04
- Re: Microsoft Exchange Server, Andrew Raines, 2006/02/04
- Message not available
- Re: Microsoft Exchange Server,
Adam Sjøgren <=
- Re: Microsoft Exchange Server, Sébastien Kirche, 2006/02/04
- Re: Microsoft Exchange Server, Adam Sjøgren, 2006/02/05
- Re: Microsoft Exchange Server, Sébastien Kirche, 2006/02/05
- Re: Microsoft Exchange Server, Adam Sjøgren, 2006/02/08
- Re: Microsoft Exchange Server, Adam Sjøgren, 2006/02/20