Re: [Jailkit-users] jk_lsh.ini -- Primary / Secondary groups [WORKING]

[Olivier Sessink]

Scott Ruckh wrote:

> I thought running the new jk_init would do this for me.  I have not looked
> at the code, but does the jk_init not copy jk_lsh if the file already
> exists?

no, jk_init only copies if the target does not yet exist, unless you
specify -f (force)

> As this was an upgraded installation and not a new installation maybe that
> is where the difference is between our systems.
> 
> Now with the new jk_lsh copied into the jail I now get the "jk_lsh version
> 2.1, started message" in my messages log.  Also, the user's session is
> correctly initiated using the [DEFAULT] section from the jk_lsh.ini file.

perhaps this has been the issue.

regards,
        Olivier