l4-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A simple question


From: Tom Bachmann
Subject: Re: A simple question
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 16:46:34 +0200
User-agent: Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060403)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Matheus Morais wrote:
> 
> On 4/11/06, *Tom Bachmann* <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>     hurd/pistachio is considered dead. We're currently looking at another
>     (not-yet-existing) microkernel called coyotos.
>     - --
>     - -ness-
> 
> 
> In fact, the Hurd on top of L4 microkernel isnt completly dead yet, it's
> just stalled. Indeed if Coyotos will be build with successful to run
> Hurd on top of it, L4-Hurd could be considered dead. Currently we can
> use L4-Hurd as an 'plan B' if Coyotos fail.
> 

I'd like to clarify that I was not speaking about hurd/l4 but about
hurd/pistachio (i.e. pistachio the specific l4 implementation),
hurd/pistachio _is_ dead.
- --
- -ness-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEO8FKvD/ijq9JWhsRAm96AJ0Q0Irf6sWUC3JCmHu2Ax4aVQ0DuQCcC+rO
TOerag3lIGFlkBK7iaC4tdM=
=VDav
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]