l4-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A simple question


From: Espen Skoglund
Subject: Re: A simple question
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 16:55:11 +0200

[Tom Bachmann]
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1

> Matheus Morais wrote:
>> 
>> On 4/11/06, *Tom Bachmann* <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> hurd/pistachio is considered dead. We're currently looking at
>> another (not-yet-existing) microkernel called coyotos.
>> - --
>> - -ness-
>> 
>> 
>> In fact, the Hurd on top of L4 microkernel isnt completly dead yet,
>> it's just stalled. Indeed if Coyotos will be build with successful
>> to run Hurd on top of it, L4-Hurd could be considered
>> dead. Currently we can use L4-Hurd as an 'plan B' if Coyotos fail.
>> 

> I'd like to clarify that I was not speaking about hurd/l4 but about
> hurd/pistachio (i.e. pistachio the specific l4 implementation),
> hurd/pistachio _is_ dead.

Just out of curiosity; what L4 implementation were you considering to
use then?

        eSk




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]