Re: Restricted storage

[Jonathan S. Shapiro]

On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 21:33 +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> On 5/29/06, Pierre THIERRY <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > In general, some capabilities typically given by the constructor need
> > only to be read-only, for example the TCB ones, like to the
> > meta-constructor and the constructor. Though in some virtualization
> > cases, they also should be unreadable. (Jonathan, I think I'm starting
> > to understand why you think that disclosure should not be the default)
> 
> I don't see why there has to be always a capability that is provided
> by the constructor.

As I stated in a previous message, there *aren't* any such magic
capabilities provided by the constructor.

shap