[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: i18n 2nd time
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: i18n 2nd time |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Jun 2002 13:08:04 +0200 |
address@hidden writes:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Addendum: this is mostly correctly done in lily.
>
> ... in lilypond-1.4.0. Don't know what happened after.
>
> > Just did this. -- It seems that gettext chokes on multi-line string
> > literals, spewing complaints about non-terminated string literals.
>
> Multiline string literals are not valid C/C++. Gcc 3.x will warn (or
> barf, whatever you want) on this.
1. Multiline string literals are valid in Python
2. I think that this is one the stupidest C++ decisions I've seen in
years. So much for in-line literate programming. I guess we'll
have to use snarfing scripts once again.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | address@hidden | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen/
- i18n 2nd time, Kopecek Tomas, 2002/06/12
- Re: i18n 2nd time, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/06/13
- Re: i18n 2nd time, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/06/13
- Re: i18n 2nd time, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/06/13
- Re: i18n 2nd time,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=
- Re: i18n 2nd time, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/06/13
- Re: i18n 2nd time, Juergen Reuter, 2002/06/13
- Re: i18n 2nd time, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/06/13
- Re: i18n 2nd time, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/06/13
- Re: i18n 2nd time, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/06/13
- Re: i18n 2nd time, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/06/13
Re: i18n 2nd time, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/06/13