[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A language reference (was: lily in scheme)
From: |
Heikki Johannes Junes |
Subject: |
Re: A language reference (was: lily in scheme) |
Date: |
Wed, 05 May 2004 15:31:10 +0300 (EEST) |
User-agent: |
HUT webmail, IMP 2.2.6 |
On Tue, 04 May 2004 13:15:12 -0400 David Brandon <address@hidden> wrote:
> On May 4, 2004, at 4:20 AM, Stefaan Himpe wrote:
>
> >
> > Sounds like an interesting plan, but have a look at the existing
> > documentation first, I think there is already quite some reference
> > documentation available. (from the website: follow the links to
> > documentation, then program reference)
>
> Well, yes, there is already almost what I'm looking for there. The
> program reference is too low level. The "notation manual" section of
> the Lilypond manual is almost it. Basically, I'm looking for a more
> formal notation manual. In fact, I can probably cut and paste a lot
> out of it. But I'm looking for something more brief, more formal, and
> alphabetical. Here's a quick and dirty example of what I'm thinking.
> Let me know if such a thing already exists, or if you think this would
> be of use or not.
>
> David
Formal language reference sounds just good. It would show explicitly that
LilyPond has a coherent syntax. The value of the language reference would
increase a lot, if there would also be given the version indication:
(since 1.7.23)
--
Heikki Junes