Re: bug report format change

[Han-Wen Nienhuys]

address@hidden writes:
> On Sunday 22 August 2004 13.28, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> > Hi Eric,
> >
> > the bug collection has gotten rather large, and difficult for me to
> > get an overview of. To help things, I'm adding a .ly -> .tely -> .texi
> > -> conversion and a GNUmakefile, so I can get a neat .HTML with
> > images, containing the status of all bugs.
> 
> Would it be possible to add a script that would warn if a .ly file exists 
> that 
> isn't in the makefile? (& could that script be run by make?)

That's done automatically.  

> 
> Also, please keep some things in mind:
> - You shouldn't create output for all .ly files. For instance not those with 
> the 'crash' flag. For some others, graphical output may be irrelevant 
> (AFAICFO, these should be exactly those which do not have a 
> corresponding .png in the repository). It would however be relevant to 
> include non-output .ly:s in the output html as well.

This is a non-issue for me, since crash-bugs always have highest
priority for me.


> - for those files that do have a corresponding .png, it would be nice if this 
> png, plus possibly a newly compiled picture, would be displayed in the output 
> (this would make it easier to quickly conclude whether the bug has been 
> fixed).

that's possible, but  for me it is overkill. You're welcome to add it,
though.

> Erik

-- 

 Han-Wen Nienhuys   |   address@hidden   |   http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen