[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: critical
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: critical |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Oct 2004 17:45:26 -0700 |
On 10-Oct-04, at 3:57 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
bugs/boxed-rehearsal-marks.ly
There is something fishy with the TeX code that I don't understand.
Personally, I don't care much for this TeX bug. It will only affect
lilypond-book users putting boxed marks above their scores, so I want
ask you if you can consider this bug "non-showstopper".
It also applies to
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.3/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/
Rehearsal-marks.html#Rehearsal-marks
I don't think we need to formally declare this as a type of bug, but
I'd like
to informally propose that we consider some bugs as "doc-showstopper".
If
we can't fix the bugs before 2.4, I should change the docs so that we
don't
have those problems in them.
It would be nice to keep box-molecule in the Reharsal Marks section of
the
docs, but we could comment it out for now if necessary. I just don't
think we
should have a manual with obvious flaws for the stable release. :)
- critical, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2004/10/10
- Re: critical,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: critical, Werner LEMBERG, 2004/10/11