Re: rfc: basic color support

[Erlend Aasland]

Ok, here's what I've got for now (this also includes the layer.patch).
Synced with cvs. ChangeLog entry added.

I've put the color macros in output-lib.scm, ok?

Med venleg helsing
  Erlend

P.S.: I'll be away for a week (so I can't reply in case there is
something wrong with my patch)

On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:04:29 +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> wrote:
> address@hidden writes:
> > On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 23:45:17 +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > BTW, I would propose to use a function to abstract the color format
> > > for now, ie
> > >
> > >  (define color? list?)
> > >  (define (rgb r g b) (list r g b))
> > I agree. Just a thought: would it be a good idea to only allow just a
> > predefined set of colors: b/w, red, green, blue, cyan, magenta etc...
> > Users wouldn't notice if we changed the internal representation of
> > colors.
> >
> > (define red '(1.0 0.0 0.0)) (define blue .... etc...
> 
> Yes,
> 
> please go ahead.
> 
> Can you send a patch with all changes collected and a
> input/regression/ test?
> 
> thanks!
> 
> --
> 
>  Han-Wen Nienhuys   |   address@hidden   |   http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
> 
>

color.patch
Description: Binary data