[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: penalty -> permission patch
From: |
Joe Neeman |
Subject: |
Re: penalty -> permission patch |
Date: |
Tue, 9 May 2006 19:15:49 +1000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.8.3 |
On Tue, 9 May 2006 18:52, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Joe Neeman schreef:
> > On Tue, 9 May 2006 18:07, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> >> Han-Wen Nienhuys schreef:
> >>> Joe Neeman wrote:
> >>>> OK, here's another try
> >>>
> >>> (and I made web successfully).
> >>
> >> how is this possible? Did you do "make web-clean" in between?
> >
> > I did, but I didn't notice this because it didn't cause the build to
> > fail. Sorry.
> >
> > Attached is a quick fix (not properly tested yet, I haven't had time but
> > I'll do that now).
>
> hi,
>
> I already fixed it near the inspection of forbidBreak.
But then \noBreak no longer works.
\version "2.9.0"
\relative c' {
\repeat unfold 13 {a b c d\noBreak}
}
- Re: penalty -> permission patch, (continued)
- Re: penalty -> permission patch, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/05/06
- Re: penalty -> permission patch, Joe Neeman, 2006/05/07
- Re: penalty -> permission patch, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/05/07
- Re: penalty -> permission patch, Joe Neeman, 2006/05/08
- Re: penalty -> permission patch, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/05/08
- Re: penalty -> permission patch, Joe Neeman, 2006/05/08
- Re: penalty -> permission patch, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/05/08
- Re: penalty -> permission patch, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/05/09
- Re: penalty -> permission patch, Joe Neeman, 2006/05/09
- Re: penalty -> permission patch, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/05/09
- Re: penalty -> permission patch,
Joe Neeman <=
- Re: penalty -> permission patch, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/05/09
- Re: penalty -> permission patch, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/05/09
- Re: penalty -> permission patch, Joe Neeman, 2006/05/09
- Re: penalty -> permission patch, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/05/09
- Re: penalty -> permission patch, Joe Neeman, 2006/05/09
- Re: penalty -> permission patch, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/05/10