Re: Bleeding edge documentation

[Nicolas Sceaux]

Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:

>> Between that section and the following one, the functions used to
>> access
>> and set music properties may be introduced.
>
> Err, ok.  I added all this pretty much as you explained it here, but
> I'm not sure that I understood it fully.  Could you check this section
> when we have another release to make sure I didn't omit or change
> anything important?

Ok, I'll look at it then

>> 11.3.3 Adding articulation to notes (example)
>>
>> I don't know where you got this example from, but there are mistakes.
>
>  From you,  :)
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2006-05/msg00039.html

yes I remembered, that was self-derision :-)

>> The wording is poor: cons does not modify the existing list. Maybe that
>> should be precised, for instance: (without modifying the original
>> list).
>
> Hmm... how's this?
> address@hidden' is used to add an element to a list without modifying the
> original list.

ok

>> 11.4.1 Markup construction in Scheme
>>
>>   "One can not feed the #:line, #:center, or #:column) commands with a
>>   variable or the result of a function call."
>>
>> This sentence should more general, we're talking here about commands
>> accepting markup-list arguments, eg. #:line, #:center-align or #:column
>> (but there are others, like #:fill-line).
>
> Does this work?
> Commands which accept markup-list arguments (such as
> @code{#:line}, @code{#:center}, address@hidden:column}) cannottake
> commands with a variable or commands which are the
> result of a function call.

hm. I don't understand some instances of the word command in some
places.

The markup-list argument of commands such as @code{#:line},
@code{#:center}, or @code{#:column}, cannot be a variable or the result
of a function call.

nicolas