Re: GPD: official shortest note in lilypond

[Graham Percival]

Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> I simply don't see any compelling technical reason to not allow durations 
> shorter than 64th (except for notation style, but then lilypond should 
> disallow beamed notes, too).

OTOH, I don't see any compelling musical reason to allow durations 
shorter than 64.  :)

GDP docs currently only discuss durations up to 64.  If higher numbers 
work, for both beamed and unbeamed notes, we could modify the docs 
accordingly.  But I suggest that this is a very low-priority issue.

Cheers,
- Graham