[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: \times vs. \tuplet
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: \times vs. \tuplet |
Date: |
Sun, 9 Dec 2007 17:31:43 -0800 |
On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 18:07:45 -0700
Paul Scott <address@hidden> wrote:
> Paco Vila wrote:
> > if "times" can be read as "multiplied by" this is no longer true with
> > tuplet.
> >
> >
> I believe that was discussed which is why I asked my question.
The more complicated this change is, the more years it will take before it is
done. With that in consideration, I believe that simply replacing
\times
with
\tuplet
is the best thing to do right now.
Cheers,
- Graham
- Re: \times vs. \tuplet, (continued)
- Re: \times vs. \tuplet, Mats Bengtsson, 2007/12/12
- Re: \times vs. \tuplet, Valentin Villenave, 2007/12/12
- Re: \times vs. \tuplet, Mats Bengtsson, 2007/12/12
- Re: \times vs. \tuplet, Graham Percival, 2007/12/12
- Re: \times vs. \tuplet, Valentin Villenave, 2007/12/23
- Re: \times vs. \tuplet, Paul Scott, 2007/12/09
- Re: \times vs. \tuplet, Paco Vila, 2007/12/09
- Re: \times vs. \tuplet, Paul Scott, 2007/12/09
- Re: \times vs. \tuplet, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2007/12/09
- Re: \times vs. \tuplet, Paul Scott, 2007/12/09
- Re: \times vs. \tuplet,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: \times vs. \tuplet, Paul Scott, 2007/12/09
- Re: \times vs. \tuplet, Graham Percival, 2007/12/09
- Re: \times vs. \tuplet, Paul Scott, 2007/12/09
- Re: \times vs. \tuplet, Jean-Charles Malahieude, 2007/12/08
Re: \times vs. \tuplet, Till Rettig, 2007/12/08