Re: Fw: correct octave

[Graham Percival]

On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 01:58:45 +0100 (CET)
Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> wrote:

> Indeed, the image in subsection `articulations and ornamentations'
> lacks descriptions for the articulations, which should be added --
> until now noone has thought of this particular problem, so it's a good
> thing if you report all such issues to the list because a big rewrite
> of the documentation is done currently.

Isn't this covered in the _List of articulations_  appendix B.8 ?

> Here's the table; on the left side the short syntax, on the right side
> the syntax form using articulation names.

I suppose that we could add this back for the shorthands; IIRC, I
removed the names since I didn't think they were useful.  I mean,
if you know what the desired shape looks like, you can see it in
the picture.  If you don't know what shape you want, then knowing
that -- is \legato doesn't really help.

Cheers,
- Graham