Re: correct octave

[Werner LEMBERG]

> > Indeed, the image in subsection `articulations and ornamentations'
> > lacks descriptions for the articulations, which should be added --
> > until now noone has thought of this particular problem, so it's a
> > good thing if you report all such issues to the list because a big
> > rewrite of the documentation is done currently.
> 
> Isn't this covered in the _List of articulations_  appendix B.8 ?

No.  Nowhere it is *described* what e.g. `c-_' means.  Only a picture
shows it, something a blind person can't use.

> > Here's the table; on the left side the short syntax, on the right
> > side the syntax form using articulation names.
> 
> I suppose that we could add this back for the shorthands; IIRC, I
> removed the names since I didn't think they were useful.  I mean,
> if you know what the desired shape looks like, you can see it in
> the picture.

Being able to see is the crucial thing here...


     Werner