[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: removing @lsr{} and only using @lsrdir{}
From: |
John Mandereau |
Subject: |
Re: removing @lsr{} and only using @lsrdir{} |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Apr 2008 09:38:50 +0200 |
Graham Percival wrote:
> We could then rename @lsrdir{} to @rlsr{} and use the same format
> as all the other @rfoo{} macros. That would simply the doc
> source.
>
> Unless I hear voiciferous complaints before Monday, I'll remove
> @lsr{}.
Very good. We'll be able to replace @lsr with @rlsr as soon as we use
texi2html to build the docs and I've modified makelsr.py or
lilypond-book so it uses doctitle header field as @section for each
snippet -- then we'd build the splitted HTML snippets document with
--split=chapter.
BTW would you like doctitle of snippets appear in Selected snippets in
the manuals? This would make Selected Snippets clearer. If you think
this is a good idea, this would be a lp-book fragment option like
[doctitle=CMD] where CMD is a Texinfo formatting or sectioning command
-- I'm thinking about using @emph for snippet names in Selected
snippets.
Cheers,
John
- removing @lsr{} and only using @lsrdir{}, Graham Percival, 2008/04/24
- Re: removing @lsr{} and only using @lsrdir{}, Till Rettig, 2008/04/24
- Re: removing @lsr{} and only using @lsrdir{},
John Mandereau <=
- Re: removing @lsr{} and only using @lsrdir{}, Graham Percival, 2008/04/24
- Re: removing @lsr{} and only using @lsrdir{}, Valentin Villenave, 2008/04/24
- Re: removing @lsr{} and only using @lsrdir{}, Graham Percival, 2008/04/24
- Re: removing @lsr{} and only using @lsrdir{}, Valentin Villenave, 2008/04/24
- Re: removing @lsr{} and only using @lsrdir{}, David Kastrup, 2008/04/24
- Re: removing @lsr{} and only using @lsrdir{}, Valentin Villenave, 2008/04/24
- Re: removing @lsr{} and only using @lsrdir{}, David Kastrup, 2008/04/24
- Re: removing @lsr{} and only using @lsrdir{}, Graham Percival, 2008/04/24
- Re: removing @lsr{} and only using @lsrdir{}, David Kastrup, 2008/04/24
- Re: removing @lsr{} and only using @lsrdir{}, Graham Percival, 2008/04/24