[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Suggestion: tempo ranges
From: |
John Zaitseff |
Subject: |
Re: Suggestion: tempo ranges |
Date: |
Thu, 9 Oct 2008 14:27:17 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> John Zaitseff wrote:
>
> > I realise that the parser will need to be modified, but I just
> > wonder if it can be done cleanly and without too many problems.
> > Let me at least have a quick look before giving up :-)
>
> I´m not saying it´s too difficult; I´m saying I won´t apply your
> patch :-)
Not trying to be difficult, but given that this idea (of tempo
ranges) seems to me to be a reasonable one, is there any reason why
not? I realise that it is a syntax change; is that reason enough?
It seems to me (from a cursory glance at parser.yy) that the changes
need not be that difficult and/or intrusive. I just don't want to
waste time writing such changes if there is no interest in them!
Yours truly,
John Zaitseff
--
John Zaitseff ,--_|\ The ZAP Group
Phone: +61 2 9643 7737 / \ Sydney, Australia
E-mail: address@hidden \_,--._* http://www.zap.org.au/
v
- Suggestion: tempo ranges, John Zaitseff, 2008/10/08
- Re: Suggestion: tempo ranges, Patrick McCarty, 2008/10/08
- Re: Suggestion: tempo ranges, John Zaitseff, 2008/10/08
- Re: Suggestion: tempo ranges, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/10/08
- Re: Suggestion: tempo ranges, John Zaitseff, 2008/10/08
- Re: Suggestion: tempo ranges, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/10/08
- Re: Suggestion: tempo ranges,
John Zaitseff <=
- Re: Suggestion: tempo ranges, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/10/08
- Re: Suggestion: tempo ranges, John Zaitseff, 2008/10/08